home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- In article <317431BB.4A3D@ald.net>, Sandman <sandman@ald.net> wrote:
- >Dwight W Weisman wrote:
- >>
- >>> I replied to this only because... etc. etc. etc...
- >>> Thank you, and lets not get a huge thread here, both sides have been heard.
- >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
-
- > I didn't want to drag this on the group, but someone seems to have a
- >chip on his shoulder; also, I don't like to leave things undefended.
- >I have nothing further to say, unless prompted to do so by someone else.
-
- You were right the first time... enough has been said and both sides have
- been heard. Now you've had your say and more. If "someone has a chip
- on his shoulder" more talk will not remove it. It'll only perpetuate the
- dispute in ever more rancorous modes until someone gets tired of pounding
- their head on the wall or, if it gets bad enough, someone in a position
- to do so puts a stop to it. If you're in the right, don't worry about
- it. If you're in the wrong, don't worry about it. The only unforgivable
- sin is wasting more and more and more bandwidth on what has become a
- personal contest. And if you're worried about what everyone else thinks,
- don't -- everyone who cares has already formed an opinion.
-
- Larry
- --
- Larry A. Shurr (las@cbgbcs.cb.att.com or lshurr@freenet.columbus.oh.us)
- A Keane consultant on assignment at Lucent Technologies/Bell Laboratories
- Innovations, but not officially representing the views of either company.
-
-