home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- In article <4l6h4s$6pu@news.snni.com>,
- Tobin Fricke <fricke@roboben.engr.ucdavis.edu> wrote:
- >"Dan Guisinger" <dan_g@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
- >
- >
- >
- >> Here I'll explain the reasons for a port to Win95/NT and OS/2.
- >> (Note, I don't use OS/2, and don't know how easy the features that
- >> windows can handle can be put into OS/2 since they aren't designed the
- >> same since 1991)
- >
- >> 1) IFS -- Windows 95 and NT 4.0 (Not sure about 3.51) use an
- >> Installable File System. This was, ALL programs can read from Mac disks.
- >
- >Windows95 uses a poor and incomplete implementation of IFS. I am not
- >sure about Windows NT, but I believe that you are correct about it.
- >
-
- the only problem is that microsloth has still not released the necessary
- documentation and DDK material necessary to create an IFS for windowsNT.
-
- --
- ________________________________________________________________________
- Michael Gile | Graduate Assistant
- gilem@rpi.edu | Computer & Systems Engineering
- | Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
-
-