home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky talk.abortion:58087 talk.politics.misc:69969 talk.religion.misc:27648 misc.legal:23376
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion,talk.politics.misc,talk.religion.misc,misc.legal
- Path: sparky!uunet!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!emory!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!usenet.ucs.indiana.edu!nickel.ucs.indiana.edu!creps
- From: creps@nickel.ucs.indiana.edu (Steve Creps)
- Subject: Re: Supreme Court Upholds Freedom of Speech
- Message-ID: <C1J642.2rK@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu>
- Followup-To: talk.religion.misc
- Sender: news@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu (USENET News System)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: nickel.ucs.indiana.edu
- Organization: Indiana University
- References: <1726@tecsun1.tec.army.mil> <14042@optilink.COM> <1737@tecsun1.tec.army.mil>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 20:55:14 GMT
- Lines: 19
-
- In article <1737@tecsun1.tec.army.mil> riggs@descartes.tec.army.mil (Bill Riggs) writes:
- >"direct inverse correlation". Clayton apparently knows one Prostestant
- >couple that felt led (by scripture, presumably) not to practice
- >birth control, found out that it didn't work out, and ended up practicing
- >a more extreme form of birth control in the end. I don't know of any
- >religious group that bans vasectomy - although not being Catholic, I
- >really don't know what the official line of Mother Church is after all.
-
- Sterilization procedures are not permitted of Catholics. They are
- considered not only artificial contraception, but also (and this word
- is used as a technical term) "mutilation." That is, they destroy the
- human body's natural ability to perform some function, in this case to
- reproduce. A surgical procedure which is necessary for other medical
- reasons, but which has as a side-effect sterilization, is however
- permitted (if the "other medical reasons" are serious enough).
-
- - - - - - - - - - -
- Steve Creps, Indiana University
- creps@silver.ucs.indiana.edu
-