home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!opl.com!hri.com!spool.mu.edu!sdd.hp.com!nobody
- From: regard@hpsdde.sdd.hp.com (Adrienne Regard)
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Subject: Re: Kodak's Official Policy (formerly: Want to adopt)
- Message-ID: <1k46fiINN52p@hpsdde.sdd.hp.com>
- Date: 26 Jan 93 20:21:06 GMT
- References: <1993Jan25.130932.10745@wam.umd.edu> <1993Jan25.214821.29561@Happy-Man.com> <106596@netnews.upenn.edu>
- Distribution: na
- Organization: Hewlett Packard, San Diego Division
- Lines: 19
- NNTP-Posting-Host: hpsdde.sdd.hp.com
-
- In article <106596@netnews.upenn.edu> rsk@gynko.circ.upenn.edu (Rich Kulawiec) writes:
- >In article <1993Jan25.214821.29561@Happy-Man.com> Irving_Wolfe@Happy-Man.com writes:
-
- >>1. Kodak should immediately fire any employee who criticizes it in
- >>public, except that the reporting of a crime or suspected crime to
- >>a law enforcement agency shall not constitute public criticism.
-
- >Wanna join the Happy Fascists League of America? Sheesh, man, one
- >does not give up one's civil rights by virtue of employment.
-
- Gee, why not?
-
- Heck, if one gives up one's right to control one's own body by virtue of
- having sex, even using the most advanced contraceptive devices available
- today, why couldn't we write a similar rule WRT employment?
-
- *sarcasm off*
-
- Adrienne Regard
-