home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky talk.abortion:57639 misc.legal:23211 alt.abortion.inequity:6692 alt.child-support:4678 soc.men:23181 soc.women:23006
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion,misc.legal,alt.abortion.inequity,alt.child-support,soc.men,soc.women
- Path: sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!newsserver.jvnc.net!yale.edu!nigel.msen.com!heifetz!rotag!kevin
- From: kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy)
- Subject: Re: A Modest Proposal: Illegitimate-conception Tax
- Message-ID: <1993Jan23.183857.18910@rotag.mi.org>
- Organization: Who, me???
- References: <1jcgauINN5rs@gap.caltech.edu> <1993Jan18.042845.19695@rotag.mi.org> <1993Jan18.064139.9795@watson.ibm.com>
- Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 18:38:57 GMT
- Lines: 15
-
- In article <1993Jan18.064139.9795@watson.ibm.com> margoli@watson.IBM.com writes:
- >In <1993Jan18.042845.19695@rotag.mi.org> kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy) writes:
- >>probably a good idea to have both parent's blood/DNA particulars on file
- >>anyway,
- >
- >I think that there are some privacy issues involved here...
-
- Quite apart from this Tax, the state has every right to determine the correct
- parentage of children born in its jurisdiction, Larry. Since when have people
- had the "right" to lie about such things?
-
- "Privacy" is not a magical incantation which can dispel every legislative
- change you don't happen to endorse, Larry...
-
- - Kevin
-