home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!ftpbox!news.acns.nwu.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!sdd.hp.com!spool.mu.edu!agate!agate!matt
- From: matt@physics2.berkeley.edu (Matt Austern)
- Newsgroups: sci.physics
- Subject: Re: Magnetic monopoles?
- Date: 26 Jan 93 22:48:37
- Organization: Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory (Theoretical Physics Group)
- Lines: 24
- Message-ID: <MATT.93Jan26224837@physics2.berkeley.edu>
- References: <1993Jan20.025101.9082@CSD-NewsHost.Stanford.EDU> <25404@galaxy.ucr.edu>
- <MERRITT.93Jan25150507@macro.bu.edu>
- <1993Jan27.055742.24399@galois.mit.edu>
- Reply-To: matt@physics.berkeley.edu
- NNTP-Posting-Host: physics2.berkeley.edu
- In-reply-to: jbaez@riesz.mit.edu's message of Wed, 27 Jan 93 05:57:42 GMT
-
- In article <1993Jan27.055742.24399@galois.mit.edu> jbaez@riesz.mit.edu (John C. Baez) writes:
-
- > Hmm, I don't. First, while naive monopoles change dF = 0, *d*F = J to the
- > nicer-looking dF = K, *d*F = J (where F is the field strength, J the
- > electric current, and K is the magnetic current), this destroys the
- > gauge symmetry of the equations! Why trade a hefty infinite-dimensional
- > symmetry group for a measly U(1)?
-
- Is this really true? I've never thought very deeply about this, but
- it seems reasonably plausible to me that you can have a version of
- electromagnetism with "symmetric" looking Maxwell's equations if you
- just change the gauge group from U(1) to U(1)xU(1), with electric
- charges as the sources for one vector potential and magnetic charges
- as the sources for the other.
-
- Aside from the objection that U(1)xU(1) is an awfully ugly gauge
- group, is there something obviously wrong with this idea that I've
- overlooked?
-
- --
- Matthew Austern Just keep yelling until you attract a
- (510) 644-2618 crowd, then a constituency, a movement, a
- austern@lbl.bitnet faction, an army! If you don't have any
- matt@physics.berkeley.edu solutions, become a part of the problem!
-