home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.physics
- Path: sparky!uunet!noc.near.net!lynx!mkagalen
- From: mkagalen@lynx.dac.northeastern.edu (michael kagalenko)
- Subject: Re: photon 'detectors' - how reliable?
- Message-ID: <1993Jan23.224608.16959@lynx.dac.northeastern.edu>
- Organization: Northeastern University, Boston, MA. 02115, USA
- References: <wwadge.727584610@csr> <1jms14$ibn@agate.berkeley.edu>
- Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 22:46:08 GMT
- Lines: 33
-
- In article <1jms14$ibn@agate.berkeley.edu> aephraim@physics3 (Aephraim M. Steinberg) writes:
- >In article <wwadge.727584610@csr> wwadge@csr.UVic.CA (Bill Wadge) writes:
- >>I was browsing through one of the many 'pop' physics books,
- >>where they are describing one of the stock quantum mechanics
- >>experiments, and noticed something along the lines of
- >>
- >> .. towards a detector which records every photon ..
- >>
- >>Is this possible? Can one really build a device so sensitive that it will
- >>detect 100% reliably every photon that enters it, and never
- >>go off by accident?
- >>
- >>Seems unlikely, but then I'm not a physicist ...
- >
- >Does seem unlikely, doesn't it? But it will happen one day (just about).
- >
- No, it won't. It's general property of QM that if you have inelastic
- scattering (photon-detector interaction is inelastic, of course), there
- always exists non-zero elastic part in the cross-section (see Landau's
- QM I, chapter about non-elastic scattering).
-
-
-
- >
- >Anyway, don't trust everything you read. The same physics book that
- >mentioned 100% efficient photodetectors could well have mentioned frictionless
- >pulleys and massless ropes: With many of the former and one of the latter,
- >one could construct a 100% efficient photodetector simply by amplifying
- >the "light pressure" acting on a ball attached to one end of the rope!
-
- The cross-section of photon-ball int. includes elastic part, so your
- detector is not 100% efficient.
-
-