home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky sci.environment:14736 soc.culture.usa:9988
- Newsgroups: sci.environment,soc.culture.usa
- Path: sparky!uunet!portal!truffula!cls
- From: cls@truffula.sj.ca.us (Cameron L. Spitzer)
- Subject: Re: Cars and suburbs
- Organization: Save the Humans!
- Distribution: na
- Date: Fri, 22 Jan 93 08:39:41 GMT
- Message-ID: <1993Jan22.083941.13852@truffula.sj.ca.us>
- Summary: bicycles are part of the answer
- References: <2936740077.1.p00004@psilink.com> <21JAN199323271566@pearl.tufts.edu>
- Lines: 10
-
-
- In article <21JAN199323271566@pearl.tufts.edu> ddeocamp@pearl.tufts.edu (DANIEL M. DEOCAMPO) writes:
- >Are there no realistic ideas for a mode of transportation which caters to the
- >individual while avoiding serious environmental harm?
-
- Many commuters could get to work by bicycle most days. Bicycling is good
- for you, clears the head in the morning, and creates approximately zero
- environmental harm. It's also a lot less dangerous than most people think.
-
- Cameron
-