NetNews Usenet Archive 1993 #3/NN_1993_3.iso/spool/sci/econ/9928

Internet Message Format | 1993-01-28 | 3.9 KB

Xref: sparky sci.econ:9928 soc.culture.usa:10242 soc.culture.japan:14450 soc.culture.british:19601 soc.culture.canada:10523
Path: sparky!uunet!ogicse!mimbres.cs.unm.edu!moe.ksu.ksu.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!news.cso.uiuc.edu!uxh.cso.uiuc.edu!irvine
From: [e-mail] (Brent Irvine)
Newsgroups: sci.econ,soc.culture.usa,soc.culture.japan,soc.culture.british,soc.culture.canada
Subject: Re: US as No. 1 (3 data books)
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: 27 Jan 93 16:44:58 GMT
Article-I.D.: news.C1IuIz.GEC
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
Sender: [e-mail] (Net Noise owner)
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Lines: 62

In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] () writes:
>In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Ray Davis) writes:
>>[e-mail] (Adrian Waterworth) writes:
>>
>>>As for the availability of
>>>different goods and services, I find it hard to believe that the range
>>>of products available in the US is so much greater than those in any
>>>other developed nation.
>>
>>Really it is.  You wouldn't believe how much more the selection
>>and variety is in most areas of merchandise.  I know it's hard
>>to believe, but if you grew up in the states and find yourself
>>living elsewhere, you wonder how folks can put up with so little
>>choice and such crap quality (in *some* cases - not all!).
>
>    This argument ignores local variations in standards of
>    living in the U.S.  I have visited California several
>    times and the standard of living in the urban areas is
>    very high.  I also lived in Iowa for some time and the
>    standard of living was abyssmal in comparison to anywhere
>    else I have lived.  The quality of produce was poor and the
>    selection limited.  The cultural life of the area was moribund,
>    we had to drive 45 miles to the nearest decent library.
>    Columbus is a big improvement on Des Moines but still a
>    long way behind urban areas of Europe that I have lived in.

I am sorry you didn't enjoy Iowa, however [assuming you mean products
not produce (= food)] I did not find the same "abysmal" state of affairs
that you seemed to have.  Iowa is a bit remote if someone enjoys cities
and what they have to offer, Iowa also has many colleges with good libraries
so I suspect your '45 minutes' contention (but if you were driving as
slow as most Iowans do, then....:)).

In what way were European Areas better?  Please elaborate!
Lets get this into a discussion, not an arguement!

>    As far as quality is concerned, I think you have that mixed up.
>    My impression of American consumer goods is that quality is not
>    that great and it is frequently sacrificed to keep prices low
>    while adding "features" that have no use.  Quality of U.S.
>    products can be very good, but the range of quality is far
>    greater than one could get away with in Europe.  Did you
>    ever wonder why European products have been making so much
>    headway in the U.S.?  Helpful hint: they're not cheaper.

I am not talking about product quality (though I feel you are mistaken
there as well - the '70s mentality of management outside of Detroit is
gone), I was referring to quickness, politeness and efficiency of
SERVICE.  The move AWAY from the mass market into more personal
service:  Cellular phones, Subject-oriented Cable/TV channels and
radio stations, 24 hour turnaround on delivery of software and
other goods, and so on.

Which Europen good are you talking about?  Can't be cars, and if I
recall, isn't there a trade deficit you all have with the US?


--
+-------------------------+--------------------------------+-----------------+
| Brent L. Irvine         | For a mere $50 these personal  | Ak! Its 1992 tax|
| [e-mail] | opinions can also be yours!    |  season! Yuck!  |
+-------------------------+--------------------------------+-----------------+