home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!decwrl!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!haven.umd.edu!mimsy!nrambr.chem.duke.edu
- From: clochmul@nrambr.chem.duke.edu (C. H. Lochmuller)
- Newsgroups: rec.guns
- Subject: Shooter's stance and rear pockets
- Message-ID: <9301261650.AA23765@nrambr.chem.duke.edu>
- Date: 27 Jan 93 03:36:40 GMT
- Sender: magnum@mimsy.umd.edu
- Lines: 35
- Approved: gun-control@cs.umd.edu
-
-
- # In article <28549@sybase.sybase.com>
- # mtxinu!sybase.sybase.com!thorick@ucbvax.Be
- # rkeley.EDU (Thorick Chow) writes:
- # #WHy is it that many pistol target shooters put their non-shooting
- # #hand in their pockets ?
- #
- # It seems like a good place to put it. TV technicians working around
- # high voltage keep one hand tucked into the belt behind their backs..
- #
- # I think your real question is, why are they shooting one-handed?
- # That must be because the official rules of their particular competition
- # require it. Of course for defense shooting one uses both hands by
- # preference.
- #
- # ++++++++++++++
- It is in the official rules that one hand be used and the back pocket stance
- is not a requirement! It is a way to assure that the off-side hand does not
- touch the bench. I agree with the "both hands by preference". As for the
- moderator's need for three pizzas in a back pack .......
-
- CHL
-
- # --
- # Yes, these opinions are mine!
- # If a reply bounces use 128.109.169.3
- #
- #
-
-
- --
- Yes, these opinions are mine!
- If a reply bounces use 128.109.169.3
-
-
-