home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!das.wang.com!ulowell!m2c!bu.edu!stanford.edu!agate!ames!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!utkux1.utk.edu!utkvx2.utk.edu!fnixon
- From: fnixon@utkvx2.utk.edu (Nixon, John Fred)
- Newsgroups: alt.messianic
- Subject: Re: Rashi's quote (was Re: Almah - Betulah)
- Message-ID: <26JAN199323151295@utkvx2.utk.edu>
- Date: 27 Jan 93 04:15:00 GMT
- References: <141898.2B53B377@paranet.FIDONET.ORG> <HEM.93Jan13134949@col400.att.com> <HEM.93Jan26111837@col400.att.com>
- Sender: fnixon@utkvx2.utk.edu (Nixson, John Fred)
- Organization: University of Tennessee Computing Center
- Lines: 36
- News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41
-
- In article <HEM.93Jan26111837@col400.att.com>, H_Markowitz@att.com writes...
- >On 25 Jan 93 21:37:34, ljmorly@polaris.utu.fi (Laura Johanna Manninen) said:
- >> Ah, but you AREN'T TRANSLATING THE WORD 'ALMAH' !
- >> Now, how would you translate it ? 'Barren' ???
- >
- >The point being made is the sign is that an "almah" who was INCAPABLE of
- >giving birth now gave birth. Thus the translation of the word almah as
- >young woman is completely valid. That is, the sign is similar to that
- >shown by Sarah when she gave birth to Yitzchak.
-
- Not really all that similar. Sarah wasn't an almah, she was a old woman,
- well past the age of childbearing. Was her pregnancy refered to as a sign?
- Not in the Torah. HaShem simply states this is what will happen.
-
- >The sign does not
- >require that she be a virgin. If almah meant a barren woman then Rashi
- >would not need to add the last phrase. If the word was to be virgin
- >then he would have added something like "veish lo yeda'ah" as appears in
- >several places. Thus the phrse means a young woman who is not capable
- >of giving birth.
-
- It is also a pretty poor sign when a young (married) woman, of childbearing
- age, gives birth to a child. This sort of thing happens all the time, and
- while we may regard it as God's favor, very few people would take it as
- a sign "as deep as Sheol or as high as Heaven". Now if a virgin gives birth,
- that *is* highly unusual! (Unless you think perhaps Achaz had the doctors
- of his day examine the woman and know that she was medically infertile?)
-
- But you are correct... it doesn't *prove* it one way of the other. All we
- have is the Septuigint translation, and the tens of thousands of first
- century Jews who did in fact accept this account, as used by Matthew, that
- the sign was a virgin would give birth. This would also be in perfect
- accord with your use of almah. But the conclusion would be... naaah.
-
- fnixon@sol.cs.utc.edu
- fnixon@utkvx.utk.edu
-