home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!usc!sdd.hp.com!nigel.msen.com!heifetz!rotag!kevin
- From: kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy)
- Subject: Re: still more of the GROUP, kevin darcy
- Message-ID: <1993Jan3.142319.12078@rotag.mi.org>
- Organization: Who, me???
- References: <1993Jan2.034909.21257@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> <1993Jan2.222342.9380@rotag.mi.org> <1993Jan3.013333.9102@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>
- Date: Sun, 3 Jan 1993 14:23:19 GMT
- Lines: 29
-
- In article <1993Jan3.013333.9102@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> mcochran@nyx.cs.du.edu (Mark A. Cochran) writes:
- >In article <1993Jan2.222342.9380@rotag.mi.org> kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy) writes:
- >
- >>Do you have an objective definition of "rampant twits"? Or is that just
- >>something you conveniently pull out of your hat when you lose a rational
- >>argument on the merits, and wish to mask your ignominious defeat behind
- >>mindless flames?
- >>
- >Oh, I don't... How about this? How about if we label all people who
- >argue in favor of restrictions on abortion, while denying that the
- >yare, in fact, doing so, rampant twits.
-
- Inherently subjective, since the person presumably wouldn't be denying
- the charge if they actually AGREED with it.
-
- I have never argued affirmatively for restrictions on abortion, Mark.
- Deal with it as best you can.
-
- >Or, we could append the label to those who think they've won some sort
- >of rational argument on merit, when they have completely failed to do
- >anything of the sort.
-
- Inherently subjective also.
-
- >Those sort of fit, don't they Kevin?
-
- Like a square peg in a round hole, or a fish on a bicycle, yeah...
-
- - Kevin
-