home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky talk.abortion:52782 alt.politics.usa.constitution:1325
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion,alt.politics.usa.constitution
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!cs.utexas.edu!csc.ti.com!tilde.csc.ti.com!mksol!mksol!noonan
- From: noonan@mksol.dseg.ti.com (Michael P Noonan)
- Subject: Re: Reconciling OT with NT
- Message-ID: <1992Dec23.073531.4848@mksol.dseg.ti.com>
- Sender: noonan@mksol (Michael P Noonan)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: localhost
- Organization: Texas Instruments
- References: <1992Dec22.051351.4921@mksol.dseg.ti.com> <1992Dec22.203138.23098@netcom.com> <1992Dec22.231102.27270@mksol.dseg.ti.com> <1992Dec23.052521.20134@netcom.com> <1992Dec23.071640.4656@mksol.dseg.ti.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1992 07:35:31 GMT
- Lines: 19
-
- Oh, and please ignore the title of this post.
-
- This thread is as old as the earth.
- The only reason I haven't changed it is because it is easy to
- recognize on talk.abortion as it is the only title that does
- not make a direct attack on someone's integrity. If you don't
- understand what I mean, tap into talk.abortion sometime.
-
- I have been trying to get a bearing on this issue (abortion) from the
- legal perspective. However, the talk.abortion group is merely a forum
- for name calling. They seem to believe in the "run down the hall
- screaming while covering your ears" method of argumentation. Can any-
- one recommend a good source on the constitutionality of the Roe vs.
- Wade decision. Right now I could care less about the morality and
- emotion of the issue.
-
- Thanks,
-
- Mike Noonan
-