home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky soc.singles:34842 talk.bizarre:42988
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!wupost!darwin.sura.net!news.larc.nasa.gov!grissom.larc.nasa.gov!kludge
- From: kludge@grissom.larc.nasa.gov (Scott Dorsey)
- Newsgroups: soc.singles,talk.bizarre
- Subject: Re: More Answers to Dating Questions
- Date: 28 Dec 1992 03:21:24 GMT
- Organization: NASA Langley Research Center and Reptile Farm
- Lines: 11
- Message-ID: <1hlrrkINNhc0@rave.larc.nasa.gov>
- References: <1992Dec24.125408.12509@wetware.com> <105@jptcs.COM> <1992Dec28.022139.18171@wetware.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: grissom.larc.nasa.gov
-
- In article <1992Dec28.022139.18171@wetware.com> drieux@wetware.com (drieux, just drieux) writes:
- >1. IF the person you are planning to date is NOT
- >cleared to the level of your current and potential
- >clearance level, then there exists a CLEAR possibility
- >that you may be engaging in a Breach of National Security,
- >as it is possible that you may utter something which is not
- >for dissemination at their level of clearance.
-
- This is true enough, but clearance is not enough. What if the person whom
- you are planning to date doesn't have need to know?
- --scott
-