home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!portal!cup.portal.com!BrianT
- From: BrianT@cup.portal.com (Brian Stuart Thorn)
- Newsgroups: sci.space
- Subject: Re: Stupid Shut Cost arguements (was Re: Terminal Velocity
- Message-ID: <72527@cup.portal.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Dec 92 21:38:47 PST
- Organization: The Portal System (TM)
- References: <n1348t@ofa123.fidonet.org>
- Lines: 28
-
- >The cost of shuttle operations is so high that regardless of whether the
- >flight rate is 4 or 6 or 8 per year that the cost compares unfavorably with
- >private launch services (or a successful DC-1).
- >
- >The Space Shuttle is simply the highest cost (per pound) launch vehicle ever
- >operated.
- >
- >--- Maximus 2.01wb
- >
-
- Space Shuttle is also the only system designed to be used repeatedly,
- is the only system capable of returning very heavy payloads to Earth,
- and is the second most-powerful booster every made in the U.S. It is
- also one of only two man-rated systems presently in use.
-
- Shuttle is also as much a technology demonstrator as it is a launch
- system. That the technology proved to costly to replace the expendable
- market is beside the point. This was the very argument used to scrap
- the Saturn V program... too expensive as I recall. Hopefully the DC
- program will eventually be able to replace both Shuttle and the aging
- expendables, but until it has proven this performance let's stick with
- what we have and use Shuttle to its fullest advantage.
-
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Brian S. Thorn "If ignorance is bliss,
- BrianT@cup.portal.com this must be heaven."
- -Diane Chambers, "Cheers"
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
-