home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.skeptic
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wotan.compaq.com!twisto.eng.hou.compaq.com!sword.eng.hou.compaq.com!mccreary
- From: mccreary@sword.eng.hou.compaq.com (Ed McCreary)
- Subject: Re: Hoagland? What's the deal?
- Message-ID: <1992Dec28.170657.43@twisto.eng.hou.compaq.com>
- Sender: news@twisto.eng.hou.compaq.com (Netnews Account)
- Organization: Compaq Computer Corp.
- References: <BzGzMz.2zp@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu> <roelle.724974838@uars_mag> <1hk5e5INN34t@gap.caltech.edu>
- Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1992 17:06:57 GMT
- Lines: 15
-
- In article <1hk5e5INN34t@gap.caltech.edu> carl@SOL1.GPS.CALTECH.EDU writes:
- >True, and quite unfortunate, since the face-freaks managed to convince a few
- >key Congressmen to enact a bill that specifically requires MO to look at
- >Cydonia. NASA was already planning to take a look anyway, but the Congressmen
- >decided to kill a few more trees so that the already-planned mapping would have
- >their imprimature.
-
- Hoagland claims to have convined Robert Roe but they eventually had
- a falling out. Does anyone have a docket number or whatever it is
- you need to get a copy of the bill. I've not heard of this before.
-
- --
- Ed McCreary ,__o
- mccreary@sword.eng.hou.compaq.com _-\_<,
- "If it were not for laughter, there would be no Tao." (*)/'(*)
-