home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.physics
- Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!destroyer!cs.ubc.ca!newsserver.sfu.ca!rs15-annex3.sfu.ca!palmer
- From: Leigh Palmer <palmer@sfu.ca>
- Subject: Re: General Relativity Tests
- Message-ID: <1992Dec29.004800.22768@sfu.ca>
- X-Xxmessage-Id: <A764E0895A021C1F@rs15-annex3.sfu.ca>
- X-Xxdate: Mon, 28 Dec 92 00:49:13 GMT
- Sender: news@sfu.ca
- Organization: Simon Fraser University
- X-Useragent: Nuntius v1.1.1d16
- References: <rsf1.725556854@Ra.MsState.Edu>
- Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 00:48:00 GMT
- Lines: 24
-
- In article <rsf1.725556854@Ra.MsState.Edu> Robert S. Fritzius,
- rsf1@Ra.MsState.Edu writes:
-
- >It's my understanding that the c^2 factor relates to Einstein's view
- that
- >gravitational effects (static and dynamic) travel at the speed of light
- and
- >that 'c' in this case represents *the* gravitational propagation speed.
-
- You are putting these words into his mouth. Why is that your
- understanding?
- Surely from a high school level book one should not infer such a subtle
- nuance!
-
- The formula does, indeed, refer to a particle moving in a static
- gravitational field, that of the sun, and employs the approximation that
- the
- sun is stationary. Thus the question of the speed with which that static
- gravitational field "propagates" never arises. The general dynamical
- problem
- of two massive bodies (the so-called "Kepler Problem" which was solved by
- Newton for classical gravitational interaction) has not been solved in GR.
-
- Leigh
-