home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky sci.math:17543 sci.physics:21942
- Path: sparky!uunet!news.claremont.edu!nntp-server.caltech.edu!allenk
- From: allenk@ugcs.caltech.edu (Allen Knutson)
- Newsgroups: sci.math,sci.physics
- Subject: Banach-Tarski (_NOT_ Re: Bayes' theorem and QM)
- Date: 31 Dec 1992 07:43:58 GMT
- Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
- Lines: 12
- Message-ID: <1hu8buINN8ve@gap.caltech.edu>
- References: <1992Dec24.101452.16194@oracorp.com> <1ht1arINNf8a@chnews.intel.com> <C03Er1.6wz@netnews.jhuapl.edu> <1992Dec30.225955.29902@news2.cis.umn.edu>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: torment.ugcs.caltech.edu
-
- charlie@umnstat.stat.umn.edu (Charles Geyer) writes, under a wholly
- inappropriate subject line:
-
- >If you think that every "real world" set should be measurable, and hence
- >Lebesgue theory is a waste of time, then you object to more of classical
- >mathematics than just the axiom of choice.
-
- >Not so?
-
- Not so. Solovay proved in 1970 that the axiom "All subsets of the reals are
- measurable" is consistent with ZF (obviously not with ZFC), under some
- standard large cardinal assumption. I think I have this right... Allen K.
-