home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!ogicse!psgrain!hippo!ucthpx!uctvax.uct.ac.za!naturman
- From: naturman@uctvax.uct.ac.za
- Newsgroups: sci.math
- Subject: Mathematical foundations of QM
- Keywords: QM
- Message-ID: <1992Dec28.154516.203431@uctvax.uct.ac.za>
- Date: 28 Dec 92 17:45:16 GMT
- Article-I.D.: uctvax.1992Dec28.154516.203431
- Organization: University of Cape Town
- Lines: 29
-
- The following diagram shows how various mathematical formalisms for QM are
- related.
-
- Wave Mechanics Matrix Mechanics
- ^ ^
- | |
- | |
- ----------------------------------------------->Fringe approaches:
- | Convex sets
- | Transition probabilities
- Hilbert space QM Involution algebras
- ^ ^
- | \
- | \
- | Orthomodular lattice approach
- | ^
- | /
- | /
- Geometry/closure space approach
-
-
- Where approaches at the bottom of an arrow can be regarded as more fundamental
- than approaches at the end of an arrow.
-
- I am currently working on an approach using orthogonality relations on sets of
- states. So far it looks like it could turn out to be more fundamental than the
- closure space approach. I think that Chaos theory will be required to justify
- the concept of "quantum states" which is taken as a primative concept in most
- of the above approaches.
-