home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!cs.utexas.edu!wupost!decwrl!access.usask.ca!skorpio!choy
- From: choy@skorpio.usask.ca (I am a terminator.)
- Newsgroups: sci.math
- Subject: Can I prove metalogical statements using logic and set theory?
- Date: 24 Dec 1992 20:24:43 GMT
- Organization: University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
- Lines: 25
- Sender: choy@skorpio (I am a terminator.)
- Distribution: world
- Message-ID: <1hd6abINNigi@access.usask.ca>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: skorpio.usask.ca
-
- Suppose that I represent logic statements as strings or sets. I can define
- functions corresponding to logical inference from a set of logic statements
- (or a set of sets of logic statements) to a set of (sets of) logic
- statements. I can try to prove things about these functional representations
- of logic inferences. Would this work? I'll bet I can read all about it
- someplace if someone could tell me where to look.
-
-
- --
-
- Henry Choy
- choy@cs.usask.ca
-
- Hey kids, start jumping up and down like idiots.
-
- Looking for LOG for a good price?
-
- Dial 1-800-byBLAMO !!!!
-
- "Log rolls down stairs. Rolls over in pairs.
- Rolls over your neighbor's dog.
- It's good for a snack. It fits on your back.
- It's LOG LOG LOG!!!!"
-
- -- Ren * Stimpy
-