home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky sci.math:17341 sci.philosophy.tech:4613
- Path: sparky!uunet!wupost!waikato.ac.nz!canterbury.ac.nz!math!wft
- Newsgroups: sci.math,sci.philosophy.tech
- Subject: Re: Numbers and sets
- Message-ID: <Bzosz1.FMx@cantua.canterbury.ac.nz>
- From: wft@math.canterbury.ac.nz (Bill Taylor)
- Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1992 00:49:48 GMT
- References: <1992Dec15.135030.18526@husc3.harvard.edu>
- <1992Dec15.214124.7444@guinness.idbsu.edu> <1992Dec17.235906.13828@guinness.idbsu.edu> <1992Dec19.140927.18700@husc3.harvard.edu>
- Organization: Department of Mathematics, University of Canterbury
- Nntp-Posting-Host: sss330.canterbury.ac.nz
- Lines: 16
-
- In article <1992Dec19.140927.18700@husc3.harvard.edu>, zeleny@husc10.harvard.edu (Michael Zeleny) writes:
-
- |> The Axioms of Foundation and Choice are analytically
- |> true of sets;
-
- What does this sentence mean ?
- Could someone please explain further ?
- Why can it be so blithely asserted ?
-
- --------------------------------------------
- Bill Taylor. wft@math.canterbury.ac.nz
- Bill Trylor. que rwft@maih.casterkury.aa.n!
- Tiel Tryloco quer rwst@maihuc sterkesy.ga.n!
- Thelworyd co quer rwsi@mvihus strikesy.gain!
- The world conqueror sig-virus strikes again!
- --------------------------------------------
-