home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.environment
- Path: sparky!uunet!psinntp!wrldlnk!usenet
- From: "Michael Smith" <p00004@psilink.com>
- Subject: Suburbs: the great untouchable (Was: Save planet...)
- In-Reply-To: <1992Dec30.194003.5390@nsisrv.gsfc.nasa.gov>
- Message-ID: <2934838224.2.p00004@psilink.com>
- Sender: usenet@worldlink.com
- Nntp-Posting-Host: 127.0.0.1
- Organization: Performance Systems Int'l
- Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 01:10:33 GMT
- X-Mailer: PSILink-DOS (3.3)
- Lines: 32
-
- >DATE: 30 Dec 92 19:40:03 GMT
- >FROM: James G. Acker <jgacker@news.gsfc.nasa.gov>
- > But what if...
- >
- > I walked to the store, and bought my 3+ grocery (reusable sacks, BTW)
- >sacks -- I want to pick my own produce, thank you -- and then took them to
- >a delivery truck, and walked home?
-
- Back to the future....
-
- This is exactly how I shop, on the upper West Side of Manhattan. A
- bonus: since all the deliveries are quite local, most of them are made
- by a guy with a handcart. It costs exactly $2 a load.
-
- It seems inescapable to me that suburbanization is to blame for a great
- deal of our wastefulness and (environmental) destructiveness. This is an
- issue that few people posting in these groups address directly, although
- transportation questions, in particular, are inextricably linked with
- settlement patterns.
-
- Since the '20's we in the US have been the "beneficiaries" of Federal
- and local policies encouraging suburbanization. Shouldn't those of us
- concerned about environmental damage -- and, I would claim, human
- quality-of-life, too -- step up to this issue, and make an explicit goal
- of stopping, and then reversing, this trend? I realize that the
- single-family house, on its exiguous greensward, in its homogenized
- socioeconomic laager, is the most sacred of all sacred cows, at least in
- the US. But the holier the steer, the juicier the steak, I always say.
-
- --Michael Smith
-
-
-