home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!darwin.sura.net!wupost!cs.utexas.edu!rutgers!fdurt1.fdu.edu!wisdom.bubble.org!sugra!ken
- From: ken@sugra.uucp (Kenneth Ng)
- Newsgroups: sci.environment
- Subject: Re: Why do they hate us?
- Message-ID: <1992Dec24.040843.8356@sugra.uucp>
- Date: 24 Dec 92 04:08:43 GMT
- References: <1h3797INNfm0@gap.caltech.edu: <b7PS02gG2ft901@JUTS.ccc.amdahl.com> <4099@master.CNA.TEK.COM>
- Organization: Private Computer, Totowa, NJ
- Lines: 19
-
- In article <4099@master.CNA.TEK.COM: mikeq@freddy.CNA.TEK.COM (Mike Quigley) writes:
- :>The reactor accident at Three Mile Island cannot be shown
- :>to have harmed any person in any way whatsoever. Fact.
- :Not yet!
- :Let's wait another 30-odd years before passing judgment.
-
- I love this. If there are no indicators of harm people say it takes longer to
- happen and to wait longer. If there are signs of immediate harm, people say
- its proof. Just like the Universal Conspircay Theory: if it proves your case
- its proof of the conspircay. If it doesn't, its proof of the conspiracy. At
- least in terms of genetic damage, if Heroshoma and Navasaki could not cause
- increases in genetic effects of children conceived after the blast, I don't
- think TMI could even make a difference. Cancers, maybe. But the current data
- from other incidates none.
-
- --
- Kenneth Ng
- Please reply to ken@eies2.njit.edu for now.
- Apple and AT&T lawsuits: Just say NO!
-