home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!spool.mu.edu!wupost!emory!swrinde!gatech!concert!rbdc!forsyth.wsnc.org!annen
- From: annen@forsyth.wsnc.org
- Newsgroups: misc.emerg-services
- Subject: Private messages and flames
- Message-ID: <1993Jan2.115211.209@forsyth.wsnc.org>
- Date: 2 Jan 93 11:52:10 EST
- References: <MfFAO5200iUzI1nalx@andrew.cmu.edu>
- Organization: Forsyth County, Winston-Salem NC
- Lines: 58
-
- In article <MfFAO5200iUzI1nalx@andrew.cmu.edu>, ig00+@andrew.cmu.edu
- (Ian J Gardner) writes:
- > I don't know WHAT is causing it; I don't care!
- >
- > Perhaps it is just my feed of the newsgroup, but I am getting a helluva
- > lot of personal traffic between readers that I personally do NOT care to
- > hear. I understand that this group is comprised of a variety of
- > different sources: BBS's, fidonet, Internet, and BITNET to name a few.
- > However, there has GOT to be some way for you people to send a personal
- > message to another person without telling ALL of us. I don't care to
- > hear about which patches you just got, or that you have the frequencies
- > for a certain city so call, or that you saw Dave the other night and
- > he's fine. That's not relevant to the entire newsgroup.
- >
- > I understand that this message is getting out on a hostile note, but I
- > could have sworn that this has been discussed time and time again. If
- > you are the one sending personal messages for all to read - STOP!
- > Figure out what you are doing and how to correct it. Please. We do not
- > have time to read every little personal message you have, so please be
- > considerate.
- >
- > Thanks.
- >
- > Ian Gardner
- > Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Emergency Medical Technician
- > Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh PA
-
- A lot of sites which have news feeds do not provide for their users to send
- private messages to users at other nodes. For such users, sending a public
- reply is the only way to get an electronic message to a user at another node.
- For users at nodes on networks which provide internode email services (such as
- BITNET and the Internet), sending private messages via a public forum is
- considered poor etiquette and a sign of ignorance; for some BBS users,
- such messages are considerd normal and acceptable. There are some
- conventions which have been adopted by some discussion groups which have a
- heterogenous membership in order to overcome some of the inherent confilicts
- which arise. In particular:
-
- 1) Put something to indicate private messages at the beginning of the subject
- line of such messages. e. g. "Private -> name of recipient"
-
- 2) Keep private messages short so that they do not take up band width and so
- that they are easy to read past. (Members of this group seem to be good about
- doing this).
-
- Since private messages are inherent to this news group, perhaps those who are
- unable to send email would be willing to keep the above suggestions in mind.
- Beyond that, those of us who are used to BITNET/Internet etiquette will just
- have to be patient and live with the personal messages or abandon the news
- group. I hope that most people will choose the former.
-
- - John
-
- p. s. On a personal note: please keep the flames off this news group. I would
- much rather put up with personal messages than flames. (My experience is that
- most readers of most groups agree with me). I have seen many an interesting
- electronic discussion be destroyed by a few people's flame war. This is an
- interesting and useful group; please don't flame it to death!
-