home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!faculty!nmrdc1!dsc3pzp
- From: dsc3pzp@nmrdc1.nmrdc.nnmc.navy.mil (Philip Perucci)
- Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
- Subject: Re: SED is buggy (libc.so.4.2 bug ?)
- Message-ID: <BzrJ7x.Fx@nmrdc1.nmrdc.nnmc.navy.mil>
- Date: 24 Dec 92 12:11:56 GMT
- References: <BzoEwL.6Jr@shrdlu.kwnet.on.ca> <BzqL64.Ev@shrdlu.kwnet.on.ca>
- Organization: Naval Medical Research & Development Command
- Lines: 11
-
- In the old SLS 0.98pl5 distribution, sed seemed to have hardware dependant
- problems. I was *trying* to compile the latest SWI-Prolog on both a 386
- with '86 BIOS and a 486 with '91 BIOS, both AMI BIOS. Sed acted quite
- "weird" on 386, but ran perfectly on 486. Only sed seemed buggy on the
- 386. Everything else was OK.
-
- --
- ===========================================================================
- phil perucci | "Any opinions expressed are solely my own views and
- ssb1pzp@digex.com | do not reflect the position of any organization"
- ===========================================================================
-