home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.origins
- Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!emory!wupost!cs.utexas.edu!news.uta.edu!utacfd.uta.edu!seas.smu.edu!vivaldi!aslws01!aslss02!duffy
- From: duffy@aslss02.asl.dl.nec.com (Joseph Duffy)
- Subject: Re: Random Chess Moves
- Message-ID: <1992Nov19.160158.4180@asl.dl.nec.com>
- Sender: news@asl.dl.nec.com
- Nntp-Posting-Host: aslss02-sub1
- Organization: NEC America, Inc Irving TX
- References: <n0ea4t@ofa123.fidonet.org> <1992Nov18.153354.21581@asl.dl.nec.com> <1992Nov18.220448.7538@CSD-NewsHost.Stanford.EDU>
- Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 16:01:58 GMT
- Lines: 26
-
- In article <1992Nov18.220448.7538@CSD-NewsHost.Stanford.EDU> amorgan@Xenon.Stanford.EDU (Crunchy Frog) writes:
- >In article <1992Nov18.153354.21581@asl.dl.nec.com>
- > duffy@aslss02.asl.dl.nec.com (Joseph Duffy) writes:
- >>
- >>The trouble with this analogy is that it overlooks the external influence
- >>of an intelligent source. If programs and computers are making improvements
- >>using trial and error coupled with randomness ... well you said it yourself
- >>above, these are within *programmed* constraints, so the outcome is
- >>intelligently bounded.
- >
- >Not really. In this case the programmer is the universe. The universe
- >lets some things happen and not others. It sets constraints (physical
- >law) and lets things run within those constraints. Organisms are like
- >the program. You could make the argument that this means the universe
- >has a creator, let us ignore that for right now. The important thing
- >is, IMHO, the program-organism analogy shows that random mutations can
- >be beneficial.
- >
- >C Frog
- >
-
- O.K., but then this is beginning to sound like the anthropomorphic theory (did
- I spell that right?). If the "program-organism analogy" is carried to its
- logical conclusion, then the universe's programmed constraints include or
- "presuppose" life. Not what one would expect from a random uncreated universe.
-
-