home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.origins
- Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!sgiblab!sdd.hp.com!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!usenet.ucs.indiana.edu!sunflower.bio.indiana.edu!adpeters
- From: adpeters@sunflower.bio.indiana.edu (Andy Peters)
- Subject: "Mad Dog" Kalki's mysterious companions revealed!
- Message-ID: <Bxu2wM.3Mw@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu>
- Sender: news@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu (USENET News System)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: sunflower.bio.indiana.edu
- Organization: Program in Evolution, Ecology, and Behavior, Indiana University
- References: <97475@netnews.upenn.edu> <8gV9TB8w165w@kalki33>
- Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 00:05:10 GMT
- Lines: 62
-
- Kalki writes:
- >We think you're a chicken, bwak, bwak, bwak! Come on, you yellow-bellied
- >pseudo scientist. Put up them dukes! Awwww, does duh poor baby want
- >momma to take away dat nasty pwoof? Awwww, don't cwy, baby! Momma will
- >make dem nasty cweationists all go away. Den baby can have his bottle!
-
- >Kalki "maggots from meat, maggots from meat" Dasa
-
- And also:
- >We get, as our payment, the pleasure of seeing self-proclaimed "rational
- >thinkers" turn into the slavering, boot-licking, do-anything-to-be-right
- >cowards they really are. While they snidely boast that they are far
- >above our level of intelligence, and that they are not going to bother
- >reading any book that conflicts with their delusion that they evolved
- >from chickens, they nevertheless post at least 50 times a day their
- >denials that they are going to pay any attention to us!
- >
- >Ahhhh, it feels sooooo good! Keep it coming, you impotent rascals!
-
- >Come on home to Papa, little demons!
-
- >Kalki "see you on the battlefield" Dasa
-
- Considering the fact that my Macintosh started foaming at the disk
- drive as I was reading Kalki's most recent ravings, I think it's safe
- to say that his companion is not a tapeworm, as was previously
- postulated, but a rather flourishing population of rabies viruses.
-
- Kalki:
-
- You have continued to insist that we shell out ten smackers for your
- book, while refusing to post any preview of the proof. It is not
- unreasonable on our part to request that you post an outline of the
- proof before we consider purchasing the book. You seem to accuse
- us of wishing to avoid seeing the proof. However, there have been
- constant requests since your appearance to see the proof. Seem a
- little inconsistent? Yes, it does. We want to see the proof before
- we buy the book. If you don't post it, shut the hell up about it,
- because you have no credibility.
-
- You have been told by many of the scientific explanations for this
- thing you insist on calling "consciousness," and have ignored all such
- postings. You have never given us a method by which we can quantify
- consciousness, and have refused to give any sort of diagnostic for
- said consciousness. Until you address some of these problems with
- your position, you have no position. You claimed that the fact that a
- biological body is changed little when it dies is evidence of
- consciousness. You ignored the analogs offered: that a car is
- changed little when it breaks down, that a computer is changed little
- when it is switched off. You have failed to show that consciousness
- exists beyond scientific explanations for it.
-
- So. Kalki. Put up or shut up.
-
- Oh. And don't forget to chant:
- Mekka-lekka Hi, Mekka Hi-nie Ho.
-
- --
- * Andy Peters * I borrowed Dad's jack. I'll *
- * Program in Evolution, * return it and his rivet * (<-Don't
- * Ecology, and Behavior * gun tomorrow * ask)
- * Indiana University, Bloomington * -Bob *
-