home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!iggy.GW.Vitalink.COM!cs.widener.edu!dsinc!ub!galileo.cc.rochester.edu!troi.cc.rochester.edu!mprc
- From: mprc@troi.cc.rochester.edu (M. Price)
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Subject: Re: Quote from ME
- Message-ID: <1992Nov20.171446.27143@galileo.cc.rochester.edu>
- Date: 20 Nov 92 17:14:46 GMT
- References: <satdn4g@zola.esd.sgi.com> <1992Nov14.151657.8820@panix.com> <1992Nov17.184434.1068@galileo.cc.rochester.edu> <1eglbhINNgaq@horus.ap.mchp.sni.de>
- Sender: news@galileo.cc.rochester.edu
- Organization: University of Rochester - Rochester, New York
- Lines: 25
- Nntp-Posting-Host: troi.cc.rochester.edu
-
- In <1eglbhINNgaq@horus.ap.mchp.sni.de> frank@D012S658.uucp (Frank O'Dwyer) writes:
-
- >In article <1992Nov17.184434.1068@galileo.cc.rochester.edu> mprc@troi.cc.rochester.edu (M. Price) writes:
- >> What massive egotistical brainwave led you to assume that a
- >>non-sentient human fetus is more important than a suffering animal?
-
- >Probably a similar one to that which led you to assume that a human foetus is
- >non-sentient.
-
- >> MP
-
- Oh. So it was in an embryology text?
-
- BTW, the use of "non-sentient human fetus," unless tautological, would
- seem to indicate an existence of a possible "sentient human fetus." In
- which case, your above statement denies the possible existence of any
- non-sentient human fetus. Is this what you really meant to do? Why?
-
- >--
- >Frank.ODwyer@ap.mchp.sni.de "You take slaves when you make us free,
- > when you make us free your way"
- > World Party - 'Ain't going to come til I'm ready'
-
-
- MP
-