home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.physics
- Path: sparky!uunet!mcsun!sunic!aun.uninett.no!nuug!nntp.uio.no!news
- From: rivero <rivero@cc.unizar.es>
- Subject: Re: No Spin in 2 Dimensions?
- Message-ID: <1992Nov18.163004.2005@ulrik.uio.no>
- X-Xxdate: Wed, 18 Nov 92 17:27:41 GMT
- Sender: news@ulrik.uio.no (Mr News)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: 155.210.147.31
- Organization: fisica teorica UZ
- X-Useragent: Nuntius v1.1.1d12
- References: <1e9n4cINNq40@huon.itd.adelaide.edu.au> <MATT.92Nov17124108@physics16.berkeley.edu>
- Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 16:30:04 GMT
- Lines: 16
-
- In article <MATT.92Nov17124108@physics16.berkeley.edu> Matt Austern,
- matt@physics16.berkeley.edu writes:
- >If you're not happy with the collapse interpretation, shop around!
- ... but be careful in the travel.
-
- Only to add evidence for QFT, I want to point that there is some examples
- of Bell inequalities in the AQFT setup. I thinsowed this in the AMP at
- Leipzig, but I dont remember who (perhaps Karyn (Apfeldorf) has
- notes of the symp, I don find the reference here...).
- By the way, had a interesting debate on hidding things in that meeting.
- (If I must to choose between pilot waves and C* things, I
- Haag side...)
-
- Alejandro Rivero
- Theoretical Phys, Zaragoza Univ, Spain.
- rivero@cc.unizar.es
-