home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!pmafire!mica.inel.gov!ux1!news.byu.edu!eff!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!ub!acsu.buffalo.edu!ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu!oispeggy
- From: oispeggy@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (Peggy Brown)
- Newsgroups: sci.med
- Subject: Re: Circumcisions (Are they ever performed on adults ?)
- Message-ID: <BxtJu3.72z@acsu.buffalo.edu>
- Date: 16 Nov 92 17:13:00 GMT
- References: <1992Nov15.060846.13787@ennews.eas.asu.edu> <1992Nov15.184102.13259@crc.ac.uk> <BxsEr1.6DA@acsu.buffalo.edu> <1992Nov16.130157.26352@crc.ac.uk>
- Sender: nntp@acsu.buffalo.edu
- Organization: University at Buffalo
- Lines: 66
- News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41
- Nntp-Posting-Host: ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu
-
- In article <1992Nov16.130157.26352@crc.ac.uk>, mdiffin@crc.ac.uk (Dr. M.C. Diffin) writes...
- >In article <BxsEr1.6DA@acsu.buffalo.edu> oispeggy@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (Peggy Brown) writes:
- >>In article <1992Nov15.184102.13259@crc.ac.uk>, mdiffin@crc.ac.uk (Dr. M.C. Diffin) writes...
-
- >>>>Greetings. Could someone explain why circumcisions are preformed in the
- >>>>first place ? Wouldn't it be just as effective to stretch the foreskin so
- >>>>it is loose enough to be fully retracted ?
- >
- >md>>Don't know about the second point. Two major resaons for circumcision:
- >md>>
- >md>>1. Cultural. Some religions (eg Judiasm) insist on it. In some places
- >md>>it is routine by secular condition.
- >md>>
- >md>>2. Infection. Reasonably common in early childhood.
- >
- >peggy>Exactly how common are these infections? What is your source of
- >peggy>information?
- >
- >I'm afraid my source of information is what I remember from my training.
-
- This still doesn't answer how COMMOND this type of infection is.
-
- >In some children the foreskin is especially tight with a narrow opening
- >(phimosis) such that the prepuce cannot be retracted which can be associated with inflammation of the glans
- >(balanitis or balanoposthitis); I seem to remember a variety of bacteria
- >may be involved. Presumably they have rather good culture conditions.
- >Anyway, the treatment is antibiotics and circumcision. I remember that
- >this is much more common in children than adults; presumably a decent
- >urogenital textbook could give you an idea of rates. I *think* that
- >when it occurs in adults it is associated with a STD such as NSU. This is not my field!
-
- Rather than circumcision, wouldn't it work to surgically enlarge
- the opening (slightly), clear up the infection, then teach the
- patient the importance of good hygiene? Less drastic, less
- painful, preserves the (supposed) increased sensitivity of a
- non-circumcised penis.
-
- >peggy>Are there any studies regarding decreased sensitivity (or is this
- >peggy>just hearsay)?
- >
- >No idea. Could make for some interesting clinical trials though.
- >
- >>>>what options are available to adult men who were not circumsized at
- >>>>birth.
- >
- >peggy>Leave it alone, for one.
- >
- >I also seem to remember that circumcision is rather more common in the
- >USA than the UK because of the virtually nil subsequent risk of camcer.
- >However this manifestation, like the reduced transmission of HSV and CMV
- >in the circumcised, is believed to be a function of hygiene, and penile
- >cancer is rare anyway.
-
- I thought so.
-
- >There is no good medical reason for automatically
- >circumcising a child, still less an adult. Bear in mind that the
- >procedure itself has concomitant risks of infection, and can hardly be pleasant!
-
- Agreed.
-
- >
- >
- >Michael.
-
- - Peggy -
-