home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky sci.crypt:4920 sci.math:15108 comp.theory:2447
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!ira.uka.de!math.fu-berlin.de!unidui!rrz.uni-koeln.de!Germany.EU.net!mcsun!sunic!corax.udac.uu.se!Minsk.docs.uu.se!janm
- From: janm@Minsk.docs.uu.se (Jan Mattsson)
- Newsgroups: sci.crypt,sci.math,comp.theory
- Subject: Re: Cryptography and P=NP
- Date: 17 Nov 92 09:00:17 GMT
- Organization: Uppsala University
- Lines: 10
- Distribution: inet
- Message-ID: <janm.721990817@Minsk>
- References: <1992Nov15.110945.19939@ringer.cs.utsa.edu> <PHR.92Nov15203840@napa.telebit.com> <1992Nov16.152501.22172@CSD-NewsHost.Stanford.EDU> <Bxtowv.246@dcs.ed.ac.uk>
- Reply-To: janm@bern.docs.uu.se
- NNTP-Posting-Host: minsk.docs.uu.se
- Organisation: CS Dept., Uppsala University, Sweden
-
- pdc@dcs.ed.ac.uk (Paul Crowley) writes:
-
- >If such an algorithm was found, I wouldn't trust RSA further than I
- >could throw it without a proof that factoring is something on this
- >order of hardness, and such a proof doesn't exist at the moment.
-
- Can you prove that breaking RSA requires factoring?
- --
- Jan Mattsson, CS student, Uppsala University, Sweden
- janm@bern.docs.uu.se or janm@minsk.docs.uu.se
-