home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #27 / NN_1992_27.iso / spool / sci / cognitiv / 719 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Text File  |  1992-11-20  |  864 b   |  21 lines
  1. Newsgroups: sci.cognitive
  2. Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!ames!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!mp.cs.niu.edu!uxa.ecn.bgu.edu!news.ils.nwu.edu!pautler
  3. From: pautler@ils.nwu.edu (David Pautler)
  4. Subject: Re: Theories of meaning
  5. Message-ID: <1992Nov20.164025.29552@ils.nwu.edu>
  6. Sender: usenet@ils.nwu.edu (Mr. usenet)
  7. Nntp-Posting-Host: aristotle.ils.nwu.edu
  8. Organization: The Institute for the Learning Sciences
  9. Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 16:40:25 GMT
  10. Lines: 9
  11.  
  12. In article <erwin.722217539@trwacs>, erwin@trwacs.fp.trw.com (Harry Erwin) writes:
  13. > Unfortunately, the brain doesn't operate that way. Two statements are
  14. > considered equivalent if their processing generates the same activation in
  15. > the cerebral cortex (or a subset thereof).
  16.  
  17. You don't have enough evidence to back up this claim.
  18.  
  19.     -dp-
  20.  
  21.