home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!usenet.coe.montana.edu!ogicse!verdix!bit!grego
- From: grego@bit.UUCP (Greg Sanguinetti)
- Newsgroups: rec.audio
- Subject: Re: Digital Amps -> next???
- Message-ID: <494@bit.UUCP>
- Date: 23 Nov 92 16:38:38 GMT
- Article-I.D.: bit.494
- References: <4310@cvbnetPrime.COM> <1992Nov21.211211.15034@bilver.uucp>
- Reply-To: grego@bit.UUCP (Grego Sanguinetti)
- Organization: BIT Portland, OR
- Lines: 20
-
- In article <1992Nov21.211211.15034@bilver.uucp> bill@bilver.uucp (Bill Vermillion) writes:
- >I read a reviews in a British audio magazine about a year ago of a Sony
- >power amp that accepted digital input.
- >
- >Advantage is to keep everything digital until the last DA and not have
- >problems with analog interconnects.
-
- I would much rather deal with the problem of analog interconnects by using
- a balanced line system rather than deal with the very real problems of
- housing a DAC subsystem inside the chassis of a power amplifier! Gag, talk
- about a mutually hostile environment, yuk.
- That is of course assuming that the actual power amplifier is essentially
- a standard analog design and not some class D switcher.
-
- -grego
- --
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Grego Sanguinetti, Bipolar Integrated Technology | Water, water everywhere,
- grego@bit.uucp or grego%bit%ogi.cse.edu | but I'd rather drink
- or bit!grego@ogi.cse.edu or ...!ogicse!bit!grego | beer.
-