home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!dtix!darwin.sura.net!uvaarpa!concert!samba!usenet
- From: Terry.Parks@launchpad.unc.edu (Terry Parks)
- Newsgroups: alt.privacy
- Subject: Re: Random phone number harassment
- Message-ID: <1992Nov21.050949.20310@samba.oit.unc.edu>
- Date: 21 Nov 92 05:09:49 GMT
- References: <1992Nov15.131927.12211@bnlux1.bnl.gov> <1992Nov16.031609.27682@samba.oit.unc.edu> <lgg94tINN9om@exodus.Eng.Sun.COM>
- Sender: usenet@samba.oit.unc.edu
- Distribution: usa
- Organization: UNC Office of Information Technology
- Lines: 13
- Nntp-Posting-Host: lambada.oit.unc.edu
-
- > So people who are anti-Caller-ID are anti-privacy? That seems
- >backwards. I assume you are using some form of doublespeak. Please
- >explain your logic.
-
- Caller-ID provides a way to control access to one's home, enabling one
- to maintain their privacy. Outlawing Caller-ID takes from a person
- this ability.
-
- --
- The opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the University of
- North Carolina at Chapel Hill, the Campus Office for Information
- Technology, or the Experimental Bulletin Board Service.
- internet: laUNChpad.unc.edu or 152.2.22.80
-