home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Doug Wing (doug_wing@il.us.swissbank.com) wrote:
- : >
- : >I just have to respond to all of the OS/2 people saying that an OS/2 port
- : >would be the best thing for ARDI to do...
- : >
- : >While I like OS/2, own it (though I'm not currently running it...) and
- : >think that it should be much more widespread than it is. I don't agree
- : >that ARDI should put a priority to porting Executor to OS/2.
- :
- : If you add up the total Linux users and Nextstep users they still total less
- : than OS/2 users. Win95 still runs on top of DOS, so a Win95 does not seem as
- : critical as an OS/2 port. E/D runs on DOS as does Win95. There is only one
- : DOS/Win program I run and that is Executor. I had to turn DOS support on to
- : run E/D and will be glad to turn support off as soon as I can.
-
- Oh, really? I'd disagree with you on that.. there are many more linux users than os/2.
-
-