home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- In article <iTM8woHpvWOd084yn@skypoint.com>
- rsteiner@skypoint.com (Richard Steiner) writes:
-
- >Compared with the Mac II machines I've used, it *is* fast.
-
- And compared to a 286, SoftWindows is fast. The Mac II came out in
- 1987. That's approaching nine years old; saying Executor outperforms
- the Mac II series is not likely to impress many people.
-
- Now, if you were to say something like "Executor's 680x0 emulation is
- almost on par with the original Apple emulator in PowerPC Macs"--which
- is almost the case since my friend's P120 running Executor is nealy as
- fast as my PMac 7100/66 when running 680x0 code--then maybe more people
- would be impressed :-). Connectix Speed Doubler's emulator and Apple's
- newer emulator are both much faster than Executor though.
-
- -Eric Bennett (ericb@psu.edu)
-
- Drawing on my fine command of the language, I said nothing.
- -Robert Benchley
-
-