home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Mime-version: 1.0
- Message-id: <199606181504.KAA00453@madison.tdsnet.com>
- Cc: executor@ardi.com
- Subject: Re: Executor/DOS Beta1 bug reports
- To: ahinds@ahinds.vip.best.com (Alexander Scott Hinds)
- X-mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.2
- From: Gene Michael DeClark <gdeclar@indy.tds.net>
- Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
- X-sender: gdeclar@mail.tds.net
- Date: Tue, 18 Jun 1996 10:04:37 -0500
- Sender: owner-executor@ardi.com
- Precedence: bulk
-
- At 07:36 PM 6/17/96 GMT, you wrote:
- >And speaking of beta bugs, does anyone know if the excrutiatingly slow
- >spell-checking under Word5.1 (under Linux, at least) has been fixed in
- >the latest releases?
- >
- >--
- >--X
- >____________________________________________________________
- >Alexander S. Hinds ahinds@best.com
- >
- >
-
- Well, I really don't know about any fixes to this on ARDI's part, but I do
- know that Word 5.1's spell checking is excrutiatingly slow, even on a real
- Mac from the era in which it was written (kind of like Word Perfect 6.1 for
- Windows, which was written when a 33MHz 486SX was the average computer-- of
- you've ever run it on a system like that, you know what I mean.) Anyway, it
- depends on what you're running it on. On a Power Mac, 5.1's spell checker
- runs adequately, but try it on a Mac II and you might as well go on a coffee
- break. It's the same thing with Executor. If you're running it on a high
- level Pentium, it's okay (but still a little frustrating.) On a 486 or 386,
- you might as well import it to a different application (one native to your
- system) and spell check it there, then import it back. This limitation in
- speed is more Microsoft's fault than ARDI's.
-
- --Gene
-
-
-