home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ Executor 2.0 / executorv2.0.iso / pc / dos / extra / docs / maillist / text / archive.96 / text5836.txt < prev    next >
Encoding:
Text File  |  1996-07-25  |  1.3 KB  |  38 lines
  1. Newsgroups: comp.emulators.mac.executor
  2. Subject: Re: Which is further along....Nextstep or Beta0
  3. Date: 28 Apr 1996 17:28:57 GMT
  4. Organization: Flat Earth Society
  5. Lines: 20
  6. Message-ID: <4m09sp$moj@decaxp.HARVARD.EDU>
  7. References: <DqJyJC.4Mv@watserv3.uwaterloo.ca>
  8. NNTP-Posting-Host: shuchart.student.harvard.edu
  9. Mime-Version: 1.0
  10. Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=US-ASCII
  11. X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.7
  12. To: executor@ardi.com
  13. X-MailNews-Gateway: From newsgroup comp.emulators.mac.executor
  14. Sender: owner-executor@ardi.com
  15. Precedence: bulk
  16.  
  17. In article <DqJyJC.4Mv@watserv3.uwaterloo.ca>, glew8709@mach1.wlu.ca (Gord) 
  18. declares...
  19.  
  20. >I read what I found and don't understand what they're saying about the 
  21. various 
  22. >versions of executor.  If there is a beta0, why do they go on and say that 
  23. >"the latest Nextstep is 199q12".  Why have both?  Why would I chose one over 
  24. >the other?  What's the difference?
  25.  
  26. The betas that are publicly available aren't unlockable.  So if you need full 
  27. Executor stuff, and are a registered user, you need to stick with the last 
  28. non-beta release, which is 1.99q12.  If you aren't registered, sure, use the 
  29. betas, because that's where the new fixes go.  I think you can copy the 
  30. browser that comes with the betas into 1.99q12, but I keep forgetting to do 
  31. this.
  32.  
  33. -- 
  34. Scott Shuchart
  35. shuchart@fas.harvard.edu
  36.  
  37.  
  38.