home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ Executor 2.0 / executorv2.0.iso / pc / dos / extra / docs / maillist / text / archive.96 / text3571.txt < prev    next >
Encoding:
Text File  |  1996-07-25  |  1.7 KB  |  42 lines
  1.     id m0u2Qsy-0007r2a; Thu, 28 Mar 96 16:13 MST
  2. Sender: owner-executor
  3. Received: from ardi.com by ftp.ardi.com
  4.     (Smail3.1.29.1 #3) id m0u2QsO-0007r8n; Thu, 28 Mar 96 16:13 MST
  5. Path: sloth.swcp.com!tesuque.cs.sandia.gov!ferrari.mst6.lanl.gov!nntp-server.caltech.edu!fnnews.fnal.gov!uwm.edu!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!cs.utexas.edu!ennfs.eas.asu.edu!news.asu.edu!general1.asu.edu!kucenskm
  6. From: GONZO <kucenskm@imap2.asu.edu>
  7. Newsgroups: comp.emulators.mac.executor
  8. Subject: Re: PowerMac compatible
  9. Date: Wed, 27 Mar 1996 18:30:25 -0700
  10. Organization: Arizona State University
  11. Lines: 17
  12. Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960327182921.632B-100000@general1.asu.edu>
  13. References: <4jblvm$9mc@newsbf02.news.aol.com>
  14. NNTP-Posting-Host: general1.asu.edu
  15. Mime-Version: 1.0
  16. Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
  17. X-Sender: kucenskm@general1.asu.edu
  18. In-Reply-To: <4jblvm$9mc@newsbf02.news.aol.com> 
  19. To: executor@ardi.com
  20. X-MailNews-Gateway: From newsgroup comp.emulators.mac.executor
  21. Sender: owner-executor@ardi.com
  22. Precedence: bulk
  23.  
  24. On 27 Mar 1996, PurdyM wrote:
  25.  
  26. > Forget system 7....how about 7.5 and <future> Copeland?
  27. > 
  28. > Think about it, we really need executor to be powermac compatible.  It is
  29. > rather a bummer to think about buying an emulator that seems a little
  30. > behind in regards to the software it can run.  That would be like Insignia
  31. > (makers of a PC emulator for Mac) releasing a 12MHz 286 emulator.
  32. > 
  33. > Ardi would scoop a huge market if they made Executor compatible with
  34. > PowerMac applications.  Let's Hope.
  35. > 
  36. > 
  37. Emulating a PowerMac would take some serious effort.  It seems like it 
  38. would be almost impossible with the current Intel Technology.
  39.  
  40. -Matt
  41.  
  42.