home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- id m0tvOSz-0007qEa; Sat, 9 Mar 96 06:13 MST
- Sender: owner-executor
- Received: from ardi.com by ftp.ardi.com
- (Smail3.1.29.1 #3) id m0tvOSM-0007qBn; Sat, 9 Mar 96 06:13 MST
- Path: sloth.swcp.com!tesuque.cs.sandia.gov!lynx.unm.edu!fg1.plk.af.mil!news.zynet.com!imci2!news.internetMCI.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!chi-news.cic.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!math.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!lerc.nasa.gov!purdue!haven.umd.edu!cville-srv.wam.umd.edu!usenet
- From: drasin@wam.umd.edu (Joe Drasin)
- Newsgroups: comp.emulators.mac.executor
- Subject: Re: DOS vs. 95
- Date: 7 Mar 1996 19:05:40 GMT
- Organization: University of Maryland College Park
- Lines: 18
- Message-ID: <4hnc24$s7u@cville-srv.wam.umd.edu>
- References: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960307073247.18301A-100000-100000-100000@lagrange.uwaterloo.ca>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: dragon.dorm.umd.edu
- Mime-Version: 1.0
- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=US-ASCII
- X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.6
- To: executor@ardi.com
- X-MailNews-Gateway: From newsgroup comp.emulators.mac.executor
- Sender: owner-executor@ardi.com
- Precedence: bulk
-
- >> I'm sure this is a surprise to noone, but Executor runs a
- >> million times better under DOS than 95. It's faster and more stable.
- >>
- >> Joe
- >>
- >>
- > Actually, I have a question: Did you try it in "DOS" mode or
- did
- >you try running it after Windows 95 loaded from a DOS session. I
- >wouldn't be surprised that, it you ran it from windows, that it would
- run
- >poorly. I'm sure it runs perfectly if you don't led windows load.
- >
-
- Running it by hitting F4 before Windows boots.
-
- Joe
-
-
-