Received: from sloth.swcp.com (sloth.swcp.com [198.59.115.25]) by nacm.com (8.6.10/8.6.9) with ESMTP id RAA05699 for <executor@nacm.com>; Mon, 30 Oct 1995 17:28:29 -0800
Received: from iclone.UUCP (uucp@localhost) by sloth.swcp.com (8.6.9/8.6.9) with UUCP id SAA13538 for nacm.com!executor; Mon, 30 Oct 1995 18:28:28 -0700
Received: from beaut.ardi.com by mailhost with smtp
(nextstep Smail3.1.29.0 #11) id m0tA5R5-000YceC; Mon, 30 Oct 95 18:24 MST
Received: by beaut.ardi.com (linux Smail3.1.28.1 #5)
id m0tA5R5-00000EC; Mon, 30 Oct 95 18:24 MST
Message-Id: <m0tA5R5-00000EC@beaut.ardi.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 95 18:24 MST
From: ctm@ardi.com (Clifford T. Matthews)
To: executor@nacm.com
Subject: expect some very brief replies from me to old e-mail
Sender: owner-paper@nacm.com
Precedence: bulk
Hi Folks,
As the FAQ mentions, sometimes I let my e-mail slip a bit. Right now
I have over 200 e-mail messages pending, most of which require at
least some sort of reply. One of the ways I made good progress over
Hackathon II was by letting my e-mail slip. I didn't realize it had
slipped quite so much though.
Anyway, I'll be pounding out quick replies over the next day or two.
If my reply is too terse, feel free to ask for clarification.