home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
Wrap
Received: from hk.super.net (hk.super.net [202.14.67.4]) by nacm.com (8.6.10/8.6.9) with SMTP id TAA09983 for <executor@nacm.com>; Fri, 21 Jul 1995 19:14:21 -0700 Received: from is1.hk.super.net by hk.super.net with SMTP id AA20560 (5.67b/IDA-1.5 for <executor@nacm.com>); Sat, 22 Jul 1995 10:09:19 +0800 Date: Sat, 22 Jul 1995 10:09:17 +0800 (HKT) From: Mr Wong Chung Pak <oscarw@HK.Super.NET> To: "Anthony J. Stuckey" <stuckey@mrcnext.cso.uiuc.edu> Cc: InUtero0@aol.com, zinc@zifi.genetics.utah.edu, executor@nacm.com Subject: Re: Executor questions - change the subject if necessary!!! In-Reply-To: <9507212007.AA02631@mrcnext.cso.uiuc.edu> Message-Id: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950722095506.15493B-100000@is1.hk.super.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-paper@nacm.com Precedence: bulk On Fri, 21 Jul 1995, Anthony J. Stuckey wrote: > > If you don't have the time read mail then don't be on a mailing list. > > If there wasn't so much *&^$*&^$ on mailing lists, more people might > have the time and inclination to read them. I realize I'm not helping the > situation any at the moment, but I'm sick and tired of people asking the > same questions that have already been answered, and talkng about things of > at best peripheral relevance. > I get over 100 email messages per day as part of my job. I would like > to get as few as possible as part of my personal life. The continual notes In my point of view, the best solution for you is reading mails only have a meaningful (in your view) subject line. And you can delete other mails. Nowadays, people live in freedom. Anyone can do what they like which obey the rules. That's all. > wondering when 1.99.o is going to be out and etc are crap, as far as I'm > concerned. Why don't you sit back and let Cliff and those guys get a > product out the door? > Partially agree. Sorry for my igorant message. Yours, Thomas