home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
Wrap
Received: from mail.utexas.edu (mail.utexas.edu [128.83.126.1]) by nacm.com (8.6.10/8.6.9) with ESMTP id AAA05480 for <executor@nacm.com>; Tue, 13 Jun 1995 00:28:40 -0700 Received: from Phred.ots.utexas.edu (tplunk@slip-19-7.ots.utexas.edu [128.83.111.135]) by mail.utexas.edu (8.6.9/8.6.6) with SMTP id CAA07616 for <executor@nacm.com>; Tue, 13 Jun 1995 02:28:37 -0500 Date: Tue, 13 Jun 1995 02:27:41 -0500 (CDT) From: "Travis S. Plunk" <tplunk@mail.utexas.edu> X-Sender: tplunk@Phred.ots.utexas.edu cc: executor@nacm.com Subject: Re: Sound Emulation In-Reply-To: <m0sLMpS-000YbmC@mailhost> Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.91.950613022441.7511A-100000@Phred.ots.utexas.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-paper@nacm.com Precedence: bulk On Mon, 12 Jun 1995, Clifford T. Matthews wrote: > Sound was dropped from the 2.0 feature set. We've actually done a > bunch of work on it, but 2.0 was just slipping too much for us to > continue the sound work. > > I don't know alot about soundcards right now, but I'd guess that the > GU will be supported. However, that is only a guess. Another guess > is that sound will be in 2.1, 2.2 or 2.3. Another feature that should > appear fairly soon after 2.0 is out is serial port support. > > --Cliff > Will Executor for Linux support soundcard emulation? another question unrelated, will there be a discount for those who have paid for 1.99x to continue to recieve 2.1x? Travis Plunk