home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!tdat!tools3!swf
- From: swf@tools3teradata.com (Stan Friesen)
- Newsgroups: talk.origins
- Subject: Re: Reality and the Merrit FAQ (2 of 4)
- Message-ID: <1791@tdat.teradata.COM>
- Date: 26 Jan 93 19:39:01 GMT
- References: <202@fedfil.UUCP^ <btd.727033478@pv7440.vincent.iastate.edu^<1763@tdat.teradata.COM> <237@fedfil.UUCP>
- Sender: news@tdat.teradata.COM
- Distribution: world
- Organization: NCR Teradata Database Business Unit
- Lines: 17
-
- In article <237@fedfil.UUCP>, news@fedfil.UUCP (news) writes:
- |> ^ To avoid this you must either correct the
- |> ^errors or provide acceptible evidence that your material is not in error.
- |>
- |> I have provided such evidence over and over again, and adequately refuted all
- |> of the counterclaims being made by yourself and others. Nonetheless, you and
- |> others simply go on posting the same tired old rubbish; obviously, by your
- |> own standards, you and a number of the others are lairs.
-
- No, you have just repeated the "evidence" that we had just got done refuting.
- You need to provide *new* evidence, that is relevent to the matter at hand.
- [The closest I have seen to this are some of the posts on isochron dating].
-
- --
- sarima@teradata.com (formerly tdatirv!sarima)
- or
- Stanley.Friesen@ElSegundoCA.ncr.com
-