home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1993 #3 / NN_1993_3.iso / spool / talk / origins / 16766 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1993-01-26  |  1.4 KB

  1. Path: sparky!uunet!olivea!apple!goofy!mumbo.apple.com!gallant.apple.com!NewsWatcher!user
  2. From: sandvik@newton.apple.com (Kent Sandvik)
  3. Newsgroups: talk.origins
  4. Subject: Re: Voyagers on the Ark of Noah
  5. Message-ID: <sandvik-250193213058@17.201.32.75>
  6. Date: 26 Jan 93 05:32:53 GMT
  7. References: <C0MF7z.DDE@gpu.utcs.utoronto.ca> <1993Jan12.202852.12010@anasazi.com> <1993Jan25.122107.1@woods.ulowell.edu>
  8. Sender: news@gallant.apple.com
  9. Followup-To: talk.origins
  10. Organization: The Language Game Inc.
  11. Lines: 20
  12.  
  13. In article <1993Jan25.122107.1@woods.ulowell.edu>, cotera@woods.ulowell.edu
  14. wrote:
  15. > In article <1993Jan12.202852.12010@anasazi.com>, scott@anasazi.com (Scott Gibson) writes: 
  16. > > So, if plants, fish, and insects could have survived, then so could
  17. > > many other "kinds" of life.  Why the ark?
  18. > How would, say, cats, dogs, people, apes, zebras, pigs, and just about any
  19. > other animal, survive without being able to breath?  The flood waters were much
  20. > higher than the highest mountain.  So no animal (or at least most) could float
  21. > on the surface for a year.  They'd fatigue quickly.  Furthermore, they wouldn't
  22. > have any food.
  23.  
  24. And we would expect that they had enough food on a small ark, eh? I guess
  25. it's miracle time again. So why the need of the ark? 
  26.  
  27. Kent
  28. ---
  29. sandvik@newton.apple.com. ALink: KSAND
  30. Private activities on the Net, opinions are not Apple's, they are mine.
  31.