home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!olivea!apple!goofy!mumbo.apple.com!gallant.apple.com!NewsWatcher!user
- From: sandvik@newton.apple.com (Kent Sandvik)
- Newsgroups: talk.origins
- Subject: Re: Voyagers on the Ark of Noah
- Message-ID: <sandvik-250193213058@17.201.32.75>
- Date: 26 Jan 93 05:32:53 GMT
- References: <C0MF7z.DDE@gpu.utcs.utoronto.ca> <1993Jan12.202852.12010@anasazi.com> <1993Jan25.122107.1@woods.ulowell.edu>
- Sender: news@gallant.apple.com
- Followup-To: talk.origins
- Organization: The Language Game Inc.
- Lines: 20
-
- In article <1993Jan25.122107.1@woods.ulowell.edu>, cotera@woods.ulowell.edu
- wrote:
- >
- > In article <1993Jan12.202852.12010@anasazi.com>, scott@anasazi.com (Scott Gibson) writes:
- > > So, if plants, fish, and insects could have survived, then so could
- > > many other "kinds" of life. Why the ark?
- >
- > How would, say, cats, dogs, people, apes, zebras, pigs, and just about any
- > other animal, survive without being able to breath? The flood waters were much
- > higher than the highest mountain. So no animal (or at least most) could float
- > on the surface for a year. They'd fatigue quickly. Furthermore, they wouldn't
- > have any food.
-
- And we would expect that they had enough food on a small ark, eh? I guess
- it's miracle time again. So why the need of the ark?
-
- Kent
- ---
- sandvik@newton.apple.com. ALink: KSAND
- Private activities on the Net, opinions are not Apple's, they are mine.
-