home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!olivea!apple!goofy!mumbo.apple.com!gallant.apple.com!NewsWatcher!user
- From: sandvik@newton.apple.com (Kent Sandvik)
- Newsgroups: talk.origins
- Subject: Re: Duane T. Gish, Ph. D.
- Message-ID: <sandvik-250193212602@17.201.32.75>
- Date: 26 Jan 93 05:29:06 GMT
- References: <1993Jan25.165508.16938@city.cs> <1993Jan25.213222.25537@spectrum.xerox.com>
- Sender: news@gallant.apple.com
- Followup-To: talk.origins
- Organization: The Language Game Inc.
- Lines: 22
-
- In article <1993Jan25.213222.25537@spectrum.xerox.com>,
- chris@eso.mc.xerox.com (Chris Heiny) wrote:
- >
- > In article 16938@city.cs, lionel@cs.city.ac.uk (Lionel Tun) writes:
- > >The fossil record for intermediates is sparse or non existent
- > >per se. There is a good reason for this.
- >
- > Well, Lionel, I'll bite. What is this reason?
-
- I started to think about the fossil record of my father's ancestory line,
- I know where my father and grand-father is buried, but after that I don't
- have the singlest clue where the rest are. In other words if I have a
- hard time finding 'family' fossiles that are barely 200+ years old, what
- about
- fossiles of whole species? Sometimes I'm amazed how much stuff you could
- dig out from the dirt in South Dakota.
-
- Just my own observations,
- Kent
- ---
- sandvik@newton.apple.com. ALink: KSAND
- Private activities on the Net, opinions are not Apple's, they are mine.
-