home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.origins
- Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!paladin.american.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!spool.mu.edu!news.nd.edu!lukasiewicz.cc.nd.edu!scharle
- From: scharle@lukasiewicz.cc.nd.edu (scharle)
- Subject: Vitalism is dead (Grasse)
- Message-ID: <1993Jan25.202838.25528@news.nd.edu>
- Sender: news@news.nd.edu (USENET News System)
- Reply-To: scharle@lukasiewicz.cc.nd.edu (scharle)
- Organization: Univ. of Notre Dame
- Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 20:28:38 GMT
- Lines: 50
-
- As I said, the person who first brought up the name of Grasse'
- in this group does not seem willing to discuss his philosophy. I've
- spent a few hours with this book now
- Grasse', Pierre Paul
- [minor bit of pedantry -- the "e" has an acute accent]
- Evolution of living organisms: evidence for a new theory of
- transformation. Academic Press, 1977
- (translation, apparently by the author, of)
- L'evolution du vivant; materiaux pour une nouvelle theorie
- transformiste. Editions Albin Michel, 1973
- and I have to say that Grasse''s philosophy is not very clearly
- (to me) spelled out. But here are a few quotes.
-
- p. 164: "Vitalism is dead". I don't know whether the humor in this
- is intentional. Anyway, the impression that some of us got from the
- earlier posting, that Grasse' is a vitalist, is disavowed by him.
- However, he does say
- p. 2: "Any living being possesses an enormous amount of
- 'intelligence,' very much more than is necessary to build the most
- magnificent of cathedrals. Today, this 'intelligence' is called
- 'information,' but it is still the same thing."
- p. 1: "One of the radical differences between physical and biological
- phenomena lies in the fact that the former must necessarily and
- absolutely obey the laws of matter." He goes on to cite flying as
- an example of living things working against gravity, and says that
- when the biological and physical laws conflict, there is death.
-
- p. 166: "Let us not invoke God in realities in which He no longer has
- to intervene. The single absolute act of creation was enough for Him."
- This is about the only reference to God or the Creation which I found
- in this book. Grasse' surely would be no friend to "creationists",
- as he freely accepts evolution (only he does not accept mutation and
- natural selection as the sole agents of evolution -- what other agent
- he has, I cannot say) operating over hundreds of millions of years,
- with no apology. In particular, he accepts the evolution of Homo
- sapiens from non-human ancestors. And he has a long description of
- the origins of mammals from reptiles. His dispute is only with what
- he calls "ultra-Darwinists".
-
- I have not found it easy to find a coherent philosophy in this
- work, although admittedly I haven't spent a great deal of time on it.
- Is there anyone at all interested in pursuing this, even by e-mail?
-
- Keywords:
-
-
- --
- Tom Scharle |scharle@irishmvs(Bitnet)
- Room G003 Computing Center |scharle@lukasiewicz.cc.nd.edu(Internet)
- University of Notre Dame Notre Dame, IN 46556-0539 USA
-