home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.origins
- Path: sparky!uunet!pipex!warwick!doc.ic.ac.uk!citycs!lionel
- From: lionel@cs.city.ac.uk (Lionel Tun)
- Subject: Re: Duane T. Gish, Ph. D.
- Message-ID: <1993Jan25.165508.16938@city.cs>
- Keywords: info requested
- Sender: news@city.cs (News)
- Organization: City University, London
- References: <Jan.21.21.49.24.1993.23599@remus.rutgers.edu> <106246@netnews.upenn.edu>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jan 93 16:55:08 GMT
- Lines: 13
-
- rowe@pender.ee.upenn.edu (Mickey Rowe) writes:
- >The fossil record leading to the vertebrate grade is pretty sparse,
- >but the fossil record is sparse for most invertebrates. Is that
- >supposed to be a surprise?
-
- The fossil record for intermediates is sparse or non existent
- per se. There is a good reason for this.
-
- --
- ________ Lionel Tun, lionel@cs.city.ac.uk ________
- / /_ __/\ Computer Vision Group /\ \__ _\
- /___/_/_/\/ City University, London EC1V 0HB \ \___\_\_\
- \___\_\_\/ 071-477 8000 ext 3889 \/___/_/_/
-