home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!paladin.american.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!ames!lll-winken!si151a.llnl.gov!brinkman
- From: brinkman@si151a.llnl.gov
- Newsgroups: talk.origins
- Subject: Talk.Origins Fallacies (was: Re: Flake theories, a litmus test?)
- Message-ID: <1993Jan22.103554.1@si151a.llnl.gov>
- Date: 22 Jan 93 18:35:54 GMT
- Sender: usenet@lll-winken.LLNL.GOV
- Lines: 85
- Nntp-Posting-Host: si151a.llnl.gov
-
-
- In article <1993Jan20.161659@IASTATE.EDU> kv07@IASTATE.EDU
- (Warren Vonroeschlaub) writes...
-
- > Alot of verbage has gone into a discussion of how to detect "pseudoscience".
-
- I would suggest that all "pseudoscience" (on talk.origins) at any rate
- can be discerned based on the inclusion of one or more of the following
- fallacies.
-
- Argumentum ad CAP-LOCK
-
- The logical fallacy that holds anything written in all capital letters
- must be true. Example, "THE SECOND LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS PROVES THAT
- EVOLUTION IS IMPOSSIBLE."
-
- Argumentum via Conspiracium ad Scientia
-
- The logical fallacy that holds any theory which is suppressed by
- science must be correct. This suppression is often proved by the fact
- that the proponents have published nothing in refereed journals. Example:
- "Of course Henry Morris hasn't published anything on biology. The truth
- is being suppressed."
-
- Argumentum via Consequncia ad Negativio
-
- The logical fallacy that holds any belief which may lead to negative
- consequences is perforce incorrect. Example: "Hitler spoke glowingly
- of evolution. This shows that evolution is wrong."
-
- Argumentum via Misspellatum
-
- The logical fallacy that holds any idea that can be misspelled to provide
- sinister connotations is perforce incorrect. Example: "EVILution".
-
- Argumentum via Lackum ad Imaginatium
-
- The logical fallacy that holds any idea which is beyond the mental
- capacity of it's opponent is perforce incorrect. Example: "I just
- can't imagine how evolution could produce eyes."
-
- Argumentum via Repititio
-
- The logical fallacy that holds anything which is repeated often enough
- just has to be correct. Example: The reduced felt-effect of gravity.
- See also the related fallacy of Refutadum via Repititio
-
- Refutadum via Repititio
-
- The logical fallcy that holds that after a suitable number of repostings,
- one can claim that he has already refuted all of the criticisms to one's
- posts. Example: The reduced felt-effect of gravity. See also the
- related fallacy of Argumentum ad Repititio.
-
- Argumentum via Compariensis ad Gallileo
-
- The logical fallcy that holds since people laughed at Gallileo, and he
- was correct, if people laugh at me I must be correct. Example: "Sure
- this sounds crazy, but remember people said that to Galileo too."
-
- Argumentum via Examplum ad Einstein
-
- The logical fallacy that holds Einstein to be the sole and final arbiter
- of the correctness of a scientific theory. Example: "Einstein died with
- a copy of one of Velikovsky's books on his desk."
-
- Argumentum via Denialadum ad Obviousensis
-
- The logical fallacy that holds that denying the obvious perforce makes
- the obvious untrue. Example: "One cannot be a theist and accept evolution."
-
- Argumentum ad Ted
-
- The logical fallacy that holds expletive, solely by itself, proves one's
- point. Example: "Bullshit."
-
-
- >-|- ___ Warren Kurt vonRoeschlaub
-
- P.S. Sorry to use your post as a mere springboard, Warren, but, hey, c'est la
- vie in talk.origins.
-
- --
- Matt Brinkman
- brinkman@edseq1.llnl.gov
-