home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!amdahl!rtech!pacbell.com!sgiblab!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!rpi!usenet.coe.montana.edu!news.u.washington.edu!hardy.u.washington.edu!lenox
- From: lenox@hardy.u.washington.edu (Amy Lenox)
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Subject: Re: control
- Date: 28 Jan 1993 04:37:19 GMT
- Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
- Lines: 32
- Message-ID: <1k7ntvINN8am@shelley.u.washington.edu>
- References: <lmdd6qINNird@ar-rimal.cs.utexas.edu> <1k6i6gINNebf@shelley.u.washington.edu> <lmdph0INNati@sahara.cs.utexas.edu>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: hardy.u.washington.edu
-
- I mark few (to none) deletions.
-
- In article <lmdph0INNati@sahara.cs.utexas.edu> brinkley@cs.utexas.edu (Paul Brinkley) writes:
-
- >In article <1k6i6gINNebf@shelley.u.washington.edu> lenox@shelley.u.washington.edu (Amy Lenox) writes:
-
- AR> = Adrienne Regard in a previous article
-
- AR>Now, before you jump into that one with both feet, ask yourself if ANYBODY
- AR>EVER gets to use my body without my consent.
-
- AR>The answer, Paul, is "no".
-
- [the one marked deletion of the threat conversation]
-
- >>I only ask that you address her point.
- >
- >Understood. I only felt it necessary to make clear that I do not wish to
- >offend.
-
- Great, I think you were clear enough about the "threat" stuff.
- I cannot find your addressing of the point however.
- Do you intend to include it? Where in our legal system is another
- entity allowed to use the body of a person against that person's will?
-
- I think it is an important point to be made. Some would argue that
- the woman gives implicit permission, but I don't think that one has
- successfully argued such, yet. Perhaps I have missed it. If you
- argue that, you must be careful to avoid numerous assumptions on
- what others would think.
-
- Amy Lenox
-